therelevantrhino

Aggressively nudging you back into reality

&
 

Dec 16 2008

Not The “So What” I Wanted To Hear

Published by threedegrees at 2:05 am under Op-Ed, Politics Edit This

I’m a huge Miles Davis fan; ‘Kind Of Blue’ has always been one of my favorites. I particularly love ‘So What’ for its improvisational journey through a basic, two chord progression.

Yesterday, however, I heard a “so what” I could have done without.

Martha Raddatz interviewed Dubya about his legacy, and yes, the shoe-thrower (by the way, you really want to click the link–I promise, you’ll crack up). I’m not going to get into the “shoe heard round the world” because I think what our lamest of lame duck President said regarding the whole of the Iraq war is more important.

[Bush] “Clearly, one of the most important parts of my job because of 9/11 was to defend    the security of the American people. There have been no attacks since I have been president, since 9/11. One of the major theaters against al Qaeda turns out to have been Iraq. This is where al Qaeda said they were going to take their stand. This is where al Qaeda was hoping to take …”

At this point, our re-writer in Chief was interrupted by Raddatz, whereupon she reminded him that al Qaeda had no presence in Iraq until he decided to invade. To which he replied:

Yeah, that’s right. So what? The point is that al Qaeda said they’re going to take a stand. Well, first of all in the post-9/11 environment Saddam Hussein posed a threat. And then upon removal, al Qaeda decides to take a stand. And they’re becoming defeated and I think history will say, one, the world was better off without Saddam, two, along with the Iraqi troops we have denied al Qaeda a safe haven…”

Except we haven’t denied al Qaeda a safe haven in Iraq. All reports from the ground admit that Iraq has become an entirely new front for the terror organization, and with friendlies on every border, an effective one at that. I’m sure if you look hard enough, you can find an article in some place like the Christian Science Monitor debating that, but you’d be getting your information from the CSM–and that would make you an idiot.

It’s not that Incurious George has ever been concerned with facts that pisses me off; rather, it’s his callous disregard for human life and inability to recognize his drastic fucking mistakes. Shrugging off the fact that our public enemy number one wouldn’t even be in Iraq unless he hadn’t decided to turn that country into a 400,000 hole desert golf course doesn’t even register with this complete and total fucktard. The 4,200+ American lives lost don’t matter, nor do the lives of over a million Iraqi citizens.

In 36 more days, we’ll inaugurate a new President, but for generations, we’ll be feeling the effects of the Bush Legacy. It will take much more than Barack Obama to restore our standing in the world; it will take all of us working together to achieve that goal.

While a leader (correctly or not) represents us globally, we need to freely and willingly immerse ourselves in other cultures, other beliefs, other ways of thinking, and yes, other religions. You don’t have to forsake the snake and apple for the flying horse and the black rock, but you should be at least half as aware of the Qu’ran as you are the Bible. American civilization just may depend on it.

dh4bo

Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)

14 Responses to “Not The “So What” I Wanted To Hear”

  1. gamingtipson 16 Dec 2008 at 3:42 am edit this

    Even as a pro-Iraq War Republican, this bothers me. It’s one thing to lie about the reasons we went to war, or to rush in based on shady intelligence. It’s another thing to continue to give the same reasons when a) we all know it’s not true, and b) the shady intelligence has been more thoroughly analyzed and shown to be false.

    The reason that we got no international support, the reason Republicans have lost Congressional seats, and the reason McCain lost is not that we went to war in Iraq.

    It’s that Bush is the man who did it.

    On a more happy note, I’ve given you the lemonade award. Thanks for a great read!
    http://thezspot.today.com/2008/12/15/lemonade-award/

  2. bill_fingeron 16 Dec 2008 at 3:53 am edit this

    Okay, now I’m angry. Or angrier. I’m so pissed I could throw a shoe at the guy.

  3. skwguitaron 16 Dec 2008 at 4:51 am edit this

    I think I could throw two…

  4. threedegreeson 16 Dec 2008 at 11:30 am edit this

    I’ve been of the opinion that I would rather see indictments thrown at Dubya than shoes, but after I saw that interview…perhaps the shoes were justified.

  5. bluesistersredstateon 16 Dec 2008 at 11:31 am edit this

    I no longer care what Bush has to say, or that some still support him. The facts and the lives lost, not just American but Iraqi as well, are enough condemnation. He never needs to say another word to defend himself, his legacy will speak for itself.

  6. threedegreeson 16 Dec 2008 at 11:41 am edit this

    @ blue sis- I do care what he has to say, nauseous as it makes me, because he’s trying to rewrite history. If we ignore him, and hope he goes away, he’ll be able to do that.

    Close to 55 million Americans think Reagan was our greatest President. If we don’t remind people of exactly what Dubya did, his “legacy team” could pull off the same shit.

  7. spinningfactson 16 Dec 2008 at 4:17 pm edit this

    Obama will have to dig his way through piles of s**t (Bush translation of s**t is protecting the dignity of the office)before he can even find the desk to start working.

  8. threedegreeson 16 Dec 2008 at 4:55 pm edit this

    @ netta- you’re greatly underestimating the intelligence of bulls.

  9. threedegreeson 16 Dec 2008 at 4:56 pm edit this

    @ spinningfacts- you can cuss on my comment board. I don’t mind

  10. bluesistersredstateon 16 Dec 2008 at 10:16 pm edit this

    I don’t think that he has the capability of rewriting history. He has been discredited time and time again. Everyone knows that only bullshit runs from that mouth. He will never, never admit that going to war in Iraq was the wrong thing to do. How could he? He would have to admit to thousands of families that their loved ones died as a result of his poor decision making. If you are waiting for an apology or some humility from that man you are going to be waiting a long time.

  11. politicalanimalon 18 Dec 2008 at 11:50 pm edit this

    I’ve heard people compare dubya to Truman but i don’t the similarities. Truman was ten times the president Bush is. He should be remembered in history as the miserable failure that he is.
    Interventionism only creates more terrorism. ‘Nuff said.

    http://politicalanimal.today.com/

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.